USPTO serial 75284672
ONTOSOFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONTOSOFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John M. Kim
JOHN M KIM GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH LLP401 B ST STE 1700SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4297UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | software for the comprehensive management of pharmaceutical data in the fields of chemistry and biology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 16, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 5, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 1, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |