Drawing for CE ONESOURCE

USPTO serial 75284831

CE ONESOURCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BONNET, ODETTE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CE ONESOURCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DANIEL J NOBLITT

David O. Caplan SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.400 E. Van BurenPhoenix, AZ 85004-2202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016printed forms for recording and communicating performance assessment data from professional continuing education activities in the field of financial planning for use by students, schools, and prospective employers; printed forms, monographs, flowcharts, worksheets and user's guides sold therewith for use in assessing data in the field of professional continuing education in the field of financial planning and related business servicesACTIVE—
041educational services, namely, conducting courses, seminars, lectures and workshops in the field of professional continuing education in the field of financial planning and related business services including the distribution of course materials and audio and video media in connection therewith; development and dissemination of educational materials in the field of professional continuing education in the field of financial planning and related business servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 15, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 24, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 2, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 21, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 21, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 10, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 7, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 17, 1998DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 13, 1998DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 6, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance