Drawing for HOLLYWOOD PALLADIUM

USPTO serial 75285366

HOLLYWOOD PALLADIUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOLLYWOOD PALLADIUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS I ROZSA

THOMAS I ROZSA ROZSA & CHEN LLP15910 VENTURA BLVD STE 1601ENCINO, CA 91436-2815UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025wearing apparel, namely, T-shirts, jackets, windbreakers, sweatshirts, tank tops, shirts, sweatshirts, vests, pants, sweatpants, shorts, and hatsACTIVEJan 31, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 17, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 17, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 7, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 18, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 6, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 2, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 1998DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 2, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 1998DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance