Drawing for ACURA SEIKI

USPTO serial 75287766

ACURA SEIKI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PAPPAS, MATTHEW
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACURA SEIKI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BILL W LEW

BILL W LEW LAW OFFICE OF BILL W LEW3699 WILSHIRE BLVDSTE 700LOS ANGELES, CA 90010

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Computer numeric control (cnc) machines, namely, cnc vertical machine centers, cnc horizontal machine centers, cnc lathes, cnc mills; metal working machines, namely, lathes, grinders and millsACTIVEFeb 1, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 21, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 21, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 21, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 10, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 23, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 23, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 8, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 27, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance