Drawing for WEBBATE

USPTO serial 75287871

WEBBATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WEBBATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R WARREN COMSTOCK

R WARREN COMSTOCK ROBERT BOSCH CORPPATENTS & LICENSINGP O BOX 4601CAROL STREAM, IL 60197

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007fuel injectors and oil pumps for automotive engines; domestic washing machines for clothes; dish washing machines for domestic use; and power tools, namely, drills, hammers, routers, sanders and sawsACTIVE
009vehicle radios, speakers, and amplifiersACTIVE
011domestic cooking ovens, domestic clothes dryers, and headlights for vehiclesACTIVE
012Vehicle Braking Systems, comprising Disc Pads, Lined Shoe, Master Cylinders, Wheel Cylinders, Calipers, Drums, Rotors, Power Brake Units, ABS units, Hardware Kits and the like; vehicle windshield wipersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 7, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 7, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 23, 2000EX1MSOU EXTENSION 1 DENIAL LETTER MAILED
Dec 23, 2000EX1DSOU EXTENSION 1 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED
Nov 18, 2000REINREINSTATED
Apr 18, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 23, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 31, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 30, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 27, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 15, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 6, 1999NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED
Feb 5, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 13, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 20, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 29, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 2, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance