USPTO serial 75288084
ARTHUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARTHUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
92700 Colombes, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIC S HYMAN
ERIC S HYMAN BLAKELY SOKOALOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing for men, women and children, namely, T-shirts, panties, long johns, bathing suits, underpants, shorts, socks, sweatshirts, sweatpants, sweat shorts, sweat suits, pajamas, sleep suits, bathrobes, dressing gowns, night-gowns, night shirts, night-dresses, overalls, jackets, over garments, namely, raincoats and overcoats; brassieres, shirts, old style shirts, robes, pyjashorts, track suits, slipper; underwear for babies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |