USPTO serial 75288206
B&W PROTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with B&W PROTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANGELO NATARO
ANGELO NATARO NOTARO & MICHALOS PA100 DUTCH HILL RDORANGEBURG, NY 10962-2100UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | nuclear facility security and safety services, namely, nuclear facility security guard services, conducting classified document analysis, nuclear material quality control for others, monitoring nuclear facility security systems, assessing and designing nuclear facility security systems, and conducting private background security investigations and pre-employment security clearance investigations | ACTIVE | Dec 27, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 27, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |