USPTO serial 75288209
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Peterborough, Ontario, CA
SIEMENS MILLTRONICS PROCESS INSTRUMENTS INC.
PETERBOROUGH, ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by SIEMENS MILLTRONICS PROCESS INSTRUMENTS INC.
SIEMENS MILLTRONICS PROCESS INSTRUMENTS INC.
PETERBOROUGH, ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by SIEMENS MILLTRONICS PROCESS INSTRUMENTS INC.
SIEMENS MILLTRONICS PROCESS INSTRUMENTS INC.
PETERBOROUGH, ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by SIEMENS MILLTRONICS PROCESS INSTRUMENTS INC.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
Lawrence E. Abelman Abelman Frayne and Schwab666 Third Avenue 10th FloorNew York, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Interface modules for connection to industrial process and inventory measurement control instruments for the purpose of communicating with common process and inventory measurement instruments used in the oil, gas, chemical, mining, mineral processing, poser, cement, water and waste water management, and pulp and paper industries | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 16, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 27, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 27, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |