USPTO serial 75288696
DRESTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 22, 2000
- Examiner
- WONG, CONRAD
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with DRESTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ARLOV, SE
S-232 37 ARLOV, SE
S-232 37 ARLOV, SE
S-232 37 ARLOV, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John R. Schaefer
John R. Schaefer Bacon & Thomas, PLLC201 N. Union Street, Suite 320Alexandria, VA 22314-2650UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MECHANICALLY OPERATED CLEANING MACHINES FOR CLEANING OF SPRAY GUNS, HAND TOOLS, POWER TOOLS, AND LAND VEHICLE PARTS, NAMELY, EXTERIORS OF LAND VEHICLES, UNDERCARRIAGES OF LAND VEHICLES, SUSPENSION SYSTEMS OF LAND VEHICLES, LAND VEHICLE ENGINE PARTS AND LAND VEHICLE BRAKE PARTS; AND REPLACEMENT PARTS FOR THE SAME, NAMELY, VENTS, CLEANING GUNS, PUMPS, COLLECTING TRAYS, NOZZLES AND CONTAINERS FOR SOLVENTS; MECHANICALLY OPERATED CLEANING MACHINES FOR CLEANING OF LAND VEHICLE WHEELS, NAMELY, MACHINES WHICH SPRAY BOTH WATER AND SMALL PLASTIC PELLETS TO CLEAN SAID LAND VEHICLE WHEELS; AND REPLACEMENT PARTS FOR THE SAME, NAMELY, PUMPS; MECHANICALLY OPERATED CLEANING APPARATUS FOR CLEANING SPRAY GUNS, LAND VEHICLE WHEELS AND LAND VEHICLE ENGINE PARTS, NAMELY, MACHINES POWERED BY COMPRESSED AIR; AND REPLACEMENT PARTS FOR THE SAME | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2020 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 9, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 9, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 21, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 21, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 30, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |