Drawing for CYBERPEN

USPTO serial 75289196

CYBERPEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BILLINGS, JESSIE W
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CYBERPEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PATRICIA A WILCZYNSKI

PATRICIA A WILCZYNSKI SCULLY SCOTT MURPHY & PRESSER400 GARDEN CITY PLZGARDEN CITY, NY 11530UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009digitizers; digitizer tablets; touch screens; LCD's; integrated circuits; computer chips; chip cards; computer hardware and software for use in digitizing of a human signature; computer hardware and software for remote control; computer hardware and software for identification of a user; computer hardware and software for storing a personal identification code or number; computer hardware and software for gaining access to a computer system or network; computer hardware and software for storing data and electronic cash; electrical and electronic equipment and devices for inputting information, in particular, a human signature, into a computer, namely, a mouse, cursor, joystick or stylus; electronic systems comprising a chip card and an electronic personal identification device, namely, the combination of a chip card with a digitizer used for digitizing of a human signature; electronic pressure sensors and/or speed sensorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 20, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 14, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 11, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 11, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 16, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 15, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 16, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 16, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance