USPTO serial 75291853
TUNDRA SPORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2408997Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 28, 2000
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TUNDRA SPORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN F A EARLEY
JOHN F A EARLEY HARDING EARLEY FOLLMER & FRAILEYP O BOX 750VALLEY FORGE, PA 19482-0750UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | men's, ladies', and children's clothing, namely, mitts, skirts, pants, dresses, tank tops, jogging, suits, leisure suits, slacks, culottes, jump suits, blouses, socks, scarves, neckwear, footwear, undergarments, sleepwear, and belts | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2006 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 21, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 18, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |