USPTO serial 75292174
MICROBURST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2460642Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 19, 2001
- Examiner
- GLEMBOCKI, ERICA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MICROBURST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN JOSE, CA
Rockville, MD
Rockville, MD
Rockville, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Berney-Key, Esq.
Susan Berney-Key, Esq. Cooley Godward Kronish LLP4th FloorFive Palo Alto Square, 3000 El Camino RePalo Alto, CA 94306-2155Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational services, namely, providing custom training in the field of computer programming | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 21, 1991 |
| 042 | computer programming services in the field software application design, character-based programming, graphical interface programming, international porting platform conversion, word processing, spreadsheets, charting, data filer and report writing programming and electronic message handling and wireless communications programming | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 21, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AERIS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MicroBurst, Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by MicroBurst, Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by MicroBurst, Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MICROBURST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |