USPTO serial 75292451
CHANGE ME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KREHELY, KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHANGE ME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK A CARLINO
MARK A CARLINO LAW OFFICE OF MARK A CARLINO2196 E CAMELBACK RDPHOENIX, AZ 85016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | baby products, namely, baby oil, baby powder, baby shampoo, body cream, bubble bath, bath gel, face cream, hair cleaning preparations, hand cream, facial lotion, body lotion, skin moisturizer, night cream, skin soap, sun block preparations, tooth paste | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 25, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 24, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |