USPTO serial 75293104
SALT LAKE 2002
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHIH, SALLY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SALT LAKE 2002?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Salt Lake Organizing Committee for the Olympic Winter Games of 2002
Salt Lake City, UT
Other trademarks owned by Salt Lake Organizing Committee for the Olympic Winter Games of 2002
Salt Lake Organizing Committee for the Olympic Winter Games of 2002
Salt Lake City, UT
Other trademarks owned by Salt Lake Organizing Committee for the Olympic Winter Games of 2002
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL F KRIEGER
MICHAEL F KRIEGER KIRTON & MCCONKIE1800 EAGLE GATE TWR60 E S TEMPLESALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-1004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | textile and textile goods, namely, textile used as lining for clothing, textile lining for garments, textile napkins, textile place mats, and textile wall hangings; bed sheets, table cloths; mats, namely, fabric bath mats; table linen, namely, place mats | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | rugs; mats, namely, cork mats, wooden door mats, plastic and rubber mats; non-textile wall hangings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Salt Lake Organizing Committee for the Olympic Winter Games of 2002
- Other trademarks owned by Salt Lake Organizing Committee for the Olympic Winter Games of 2002
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named SALT LAKE 2002
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 7, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |