USPTO serial 75293769
THE HOLLYWOOD EXPERIENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE HOLLYWOOD EXPERIENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANNE HIARING
19 BROOKMONTSAN ANSELMO, CA 94960-1412UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Multimedia entertainment production; featuring motion picture films, slides, CD-ROMs, video and audio sound tapes, laser disks, holographic and other projections and computer-controlled special effects about Hollywood, California | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Patterson, Charles
- Other trademarks owned by Patterson, Charles
- Other trademarks owned by Patterson, Craig
- Other trademarks owned by Patterson, Craig
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named THE HOLLYWOOD EXPERIENCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 5, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |