USPTO serial 75295077
CHINA SHOPPING NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHINA SHOPPING NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHELDON R MEYER
SHELDON R MEYER FLIESLER DUBB MEYER & LOVEJOY LLP4 EMBARCADERO CTR STE 400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4156UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | direct mail advertising and telemarketing of consumer products and services; print catalogs, electronic mail order and catalog services featuring consumer products and services; licensing television programs to broadcast and cable television operators, and on-line ordering services featuring consumer products and services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | cable television transmission and broadcasting of shows featuring consumer merchandise and consumer services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 19, 2000 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 6, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 28, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |