Drawing for EXTREME-O-PHILES

USPTO serial 75295112

EXTREME-O-PHILES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXTREME-O-PHILES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MEYER A GROSS

MEYER A GROSS SCHWEITZER CORNMAN GROSS & BONDELL230 PARK AVE STE 2200NEW YORK, NY 10169-0059UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028ADULT AND CHILDREN TOY CATEGORIES, NAMELY PLUSH TOYS AND DOLLS, BOARD GAMES, CARD GAMES, ACTION SKILL GAMES, MANIPULATIVE PUZZLES, JIGSAW PUZZLES, CUBE PUZZLES, HAND-HELD UNIT FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES, DART GAMES, ELECTRONIC, BOARD, CARD, AND ACTION SKILL EDUCATIONAL GAMES FOR CHILDREN, ELECTRONIC GAME EQUIPMENT WITH A WATCH FUNCTION, AND HAND-HELD UNIT FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES; COSTUME, FACE AND SCUBA DIVERS MASKS, INFLATABLE BEACH TOYS FOR POOL OR OCEAN; BATH TOYS, INFLATABLE TOYS, BUBBLE MAKING WAND AND SOLUTION SETS, MECHANICAL BUBBLE MAKING TOYS AND BATTERY OPERATED BUBBLE BLOWING TOYS, TOY WATCHES, TOY BANKS, WIND-UP TOYS, ACTION AND RIDE-ON TOYS, NAMELY, TOY ACTION FIGURES, MECHANICAL ACTION TOYS AND ELECTRIC ACTION TOYS; TOY CARS, ELECTRONICALLY-OPERATED TOY MOTOR VEHICLES, NON-MOTORIZED SCOOTERS, ROLLER AND INCLINE SKATES, ICE SKATES, SKATE BOARDS, SNOW BOARDS, SNOW SKIS, SKY BOARDS FOR BALANCING AND RIDING PURPOSES WHILE SKY DIVING, SURF BOARDS, AND WATER BOARDS, WATER SKIS, SELF-PROPELLED WATER SKI VEHICLE, SELF-PROPELLED WATER SKIS; CHRISTMAS TREE ORNAMENTS AND HALLOWEEN COSTUMES FEATURING MERCHANDISING CHARACTERS, CHRISTMAS TREE DECORATIONSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 14, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 2, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 14, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 22, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 21, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 30, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 10, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 9, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 20, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 3, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance