USPTO serial 75296012
CABARET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WINTERS, SHANNA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CABARET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-01768 Glashutte, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIC P SCHELLIN
ERIC P SCHELLIN SCHELLIN & ASSOC LTD2121 CRYSTAL DR STE 704ARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | timekeeping instruments, namely, clocks, watches, stopwatches, clock parts, including clock mechanismsand clock housings; watch bands | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 1, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 19, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |