USPTO serial 75297144
HEALTHTEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEALTHTEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICAH D STOLOWITZ
MICAH D STOLOWITZ MARGER JOHNSON MCCOLLOM & STOLOWITZ PC1030 SW MORRISON STPORTLAND, OR 97205UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services in the field of pharmaceuticals and home health care supplies and equipment; namely, prescription and over-the-counter medicines, nutritional supplements, hospital-type beds, walkers, wheelchairs, bath benches, grab bars, canes, crutches, orthopedic and sports medicine braces and supports, athletic tape, incontinence and urologic supplies, ostomy supplies, wound care supplies, tapes and dressings, vascular stockings and compression garments, diabetic strips, meters and lancets, and postmastectomy breast forms and bras | ACTIVE | May 1, 1988 |
| 039 | Rental of wheelchairs | ACTIVE | May 1, 1988 |
| 042 | Rental of hospital-type beds, walkers, and patient lifts; rental of respiratory equipment and oxygen tanks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |