Drawing for NORTHWEST CHOICE

USPTO serial 75297565

NORTHWEST CHOICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2948149Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 10, 2005
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NORTHWEST CHOICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert A. Radcliffe

ROBERT A RADCLIFFE OF KARR TUTTLE CAMPBELL1201 3RD AVE STE 2900SEATTLE, WA 98101-3028UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029poultry, crab for human consumption, shrimp for human consumption, butter and cheeseSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—
030teas, ice cream, sugar, processed wheatSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 2006C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Mar 29, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 31, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 10, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 2, 2005REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 2, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 31, 2005CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jun 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2002SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 8, 2002DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 7, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 22, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 21, 2002DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 18, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 1, 2001OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 1, 2001OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Apr 14, 1999OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 11, 1999ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 6, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 8, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 3, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 1, 1998ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 24, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 23, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 1, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance