USPTO serial 75298013
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
TOLEDO, OH
Toledo Area Telecommunications Services, Inc.
Toledo, OH
Other trademarks owned by Toledo Area Telecommunications Services, Inc.
Toledo Area Telecommunications Services, Inc.
Toledo, OH
Other trademarks owned by Toledo Area Telecommunications Services, Inc.
Toledo Area Telecommunications Services, Inc.
Toledo, OH
Other trademarks owned by Toledo Area Telecommunications Services, Inc.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD R. FRASER
DONALD R FRASER FRASER MARTIN & MILLER LLC28366 KENSINGTON LNPERRYSBURG, OH 43551UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | telecommunications services, namely, the transmission of video, data, and voice communications via coaxial and fiber-optic lines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 23, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 1, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |