USPTO serial 75298142
BEAU BRUMMEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAST, PAUL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEAU BRUMMEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAY H BEGLER
JAY H BEGLER HARRIS BEACH & WILCOX LLP250 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10177UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cologne | ACTIVE | Apr 25, 1959 |
| 018 | leather accessories, namely, briefcases, wallets, suitcases, toiletry kits sold empty, knapsacks, backpacks and credit card cases | ACTIVE | Apr 25, 1959 |
| 025 | men's clothing, namely, suits, sport jackets, slacks, overcoats, shirts, sport shirts, slacks, dress shirts, ties, socks, pocket squares, belts, suspenders; knitwear, namely, sweaters, shirts, scarves, and ties; outerwear, namely, rain coats, jackets, coats, and hats; and activewear, namely, sweat tops and bottoms, jackets, polo shirts, T-shirts, and jeans | ACTIVE | Apr 25, 1959 |
| 035 | retail store services, namely, clothing stores | ACTIVE | Apr 25, 1959 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 16, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |