Drawing for PRIME-VANTAGE.COM

USPTO serial 75298958

PRIME-VANTAGE.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LYKOS, ANGELA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRIME-VANTAGE.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHRISTOPHER C ROCHE

CHRISTOPHER C ROCHE KENYON & KENYON1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS PLANNING VIA A GLOBAL INFORMATION NETWORK; BUSINESS MARKETING CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, CONSULTING SERVICES FOR PRODUCT AND SERVICE MARKETING, MARKETING CAMPAIGN PLANNING, STRATEGY, IMPLEMENTATION AND MANAGEMENT, OUTSOURCING FACILITIES, DATA WAREHOUSING, COMPUTER BUREAU SERVICES, AND CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND BUSINESS CONSULTING IN THE FIELD OF CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT AND SYSTEM TRAINING; PROVIDING INFORMATION VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTERIZED NETWORK MARKETING SYSTEMS, MARKETING DATA COLLECTION AND ACCESS SYSTEMS, MARKETING DATA INTEGRATION, MARKETING DATA MANAGEMENT, MARKETING REPORT GENERATION, CUSTOMER COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, CUSTOMER DATA COLLECTION, MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, CUSTOMER AND PRODUCT INFORMATION SECURITY SYSTEMS AND SYSTEMS FOR INTEGRATING MARKETING AND CUSTOMER DATA WITH OTHER BUSINESS AND STATISTICAL MARKETING DATAACTIVE—
042COMPUTER SOFTWARE SYSTEM DESIGN FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS, COMPUTER OUTSOURCING FACILITIES, DATA WAREHOUSING, COMPUTER BUREAU SERVICES AND TRAINING; COMPUTER SYSTEM DESIGN FOR OTHERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 10, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 15, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 11, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 19, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 17, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 28, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 18, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance