USPTO serial 75298961
PRIME VANTAGE DCM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRIME VANTAGE DCM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Brentford, Middlesex, TW8 0BA, GB
Brentford, Middlesex, TW8 0BA, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER C ROCHE
CHRISTOPHER C ROCHE KENYON & KENYON1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software, computerized data and databases, computer hardware, computer recordal, storage and retrieval media, for product service marketing, market campaign planning, marketing campaign strategy, implementation and management, customer relationship management systems, telecommunication and on-line global computer network and other computerized network marketing systems, marketing data collection and access systems, marketing data integration, marketing data management, marketing report generation, customer communication management systems, customer data collection and management systems, customer and information security systems and systems for integrating marketing and customer data with other business and statistical information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 16, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 30, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 23, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |