USPTO serial 75298965
PRIME VANTAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRIME VANTAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Brentford, Middlesex, TW8 0BA, GB
Brentford, Middlesex, TW8 0BA, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Bevilacqua
MICHAEL J BELILACQUS HALE AND DORR LLP60 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business planning and consultation services in the field of product and service marketing, marketing campaign planning, strategy, implementation and management, customer relationship management systems, telecommunication and computerized network marketing systems, marketing data collection and access systems, marketing data integration, marketing data management, marketing report generation, customer communication management systems, customer data collection and management systems, customer and product information security systems and systems for integrating marketing and customer data with other business and statistical information | ACTIVE | Sep 8, 1997 |
| 042 | computer system design services | ACTIVE | Sep 8, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 7, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 1, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 28, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |