Drawing for LEAPFROG

USPTO serial 75299503

LEAPFROG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2334144Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 28, 2000
Examiner
TINGLEY, JOHN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with LEAPFROG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John L. DuPre'

JOHN L. DUPRE' HAMILTON, BROOK, SMITH & REYNOLDS, P.C.530 VIRGINIA ROAD, P.O. BOX 9133CONCORD, MA 01742-9133UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Industrial robot used for transport in the process of manufacturing integrated circuits and other electronic devicesSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 20, 2026ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 16, 2026ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 29, 2021CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Mar 28, 2019REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 4, 2010RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Mar 4, 201089AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Mar 3, 201089AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Mar 3, 2010EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2009PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9—
Sep 21, 2009PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9—
Jun 13, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jun 11, 2009E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2006C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 26, 2006PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Apr 18, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 14, 2006815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 14, 2006E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2000R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 4, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 18, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 30, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 13, 1999PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 18, 1998ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 17, 1998PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance