USPTO serial 75299744
YOUTH LEADERS INTERNATIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with YOUTH LEADERS INTERNATIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Silver Spring, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WARREN N LOW
WARREN N LOW LOW & LOWP O BOX 2184ARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational services, namely, conducting classes and workshops in civic responsibility, in business and government, in services to the local community, in understanding and cooperating with differing cultures, and in critical thinking, to train youth in leadership skills | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 31, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 30, 1999 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 1999 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |