USPTO serial 75300197
GINKGO THINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GINKGO THINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD A. FLYNT
RICHARD A FLYNT ROYLANCE ABRAMS BERDO & GOODMAN LLP1300 19TH ST N WSTE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | botanical essences and extracts and preparations for use as ingredients in the manufacture of pharmaceuticals, food supplements, cosmetics and personal care preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 11, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 7, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 6, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |