USPTO serial 75300478
CERTIFIED PROFESSIONAL MOVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CERTIFIED PROFESSIONAL MOVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
National Moving & Storage Association, Inc.
Fairfax, VA
Other trademarks owned by National Moving & Storage Association, Inc.
National Moving & Storage Association, Inc.
Fairfax, VA
Other trademarks owned by National Moving & Storage Association, Inc.
National Training Consortium, Inc.
Fairfax, VA
Other trademarks owned by National Training Consortium, Inc.
National Training Consortium, Inc.
Fairfax, VA
Other trademarks owned by National Training Consortium, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES C MCMAHON JR
JAMES C MCMAHON JR BRODSKY ALTMAN & MCMAHON475 PARK AVE S 7TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| B | certification in connection with the training of professionals in the transportation and storage industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by National Moving & Storage Association, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by National Moving & Storage Association, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by National Training Consortium, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by National Training Consortium, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class B
- Similar marks named CERTIFIED PROFESSIONAL MOVER
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 1, 2001 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| May 8, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 1, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |