USPTO serial 75300723
SPORTSCHEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPORTSCHEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Colorado Springs, CO
Colorado Springs, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KENT H BORGES
KENT H BORGES SPARKS, WILLSON, BORGES, BRANDT, ET AL24 S WEBER ST STE 400P O BOX 1678 (80901)COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80903Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | toy storage containers | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | educational and sports-related toys for child development and fitness, namely, bean bags, soft foam balls, rubber balls, hoops, disk type toss toys, plastic ribbon strips for exercise and skill development, blocks, plush animals, toy figures, and guide books and instructional video tapes sold therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 24, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 15, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 7, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 27, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 12, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |