USPTO serial 75300829
THRIFTY CALL COMMUNICATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THRIFTY CALL COMMUNICATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KRISTIN JORDAN HARKINS
KRISTIN JORDAN HARKINS CONLEY ROSE & TAYON PC5700 GRANITE PKWY STE 330PLANO, TX 75024-6608UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | telecommunications services, namely, telephone communication services; telephone voice messaging services; electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording, storage and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; facsimile transmission; electronic store-and-forward messaging; electronic transmission of messages, data and documents; personal communication services; ISDN services; and audio teleconferencing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 25, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 15, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |