USPTO serial 75302274
MEREX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COOPER, VANESSA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEREX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARVIN R STERN
MARVIN R STERN JACOBSON PRICE HOLMAN & STERN PLLCTHE JENIFER BLDG400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | film sheets, fabrics and composites thereof for building applications, namely geotechnical, including soil reinforcement and soil stabilization, landfill and mining and plastic mesh, film sheets, fabrics and composites thereof for erosion control, marine, asphalt, roads, concrete, fencing and foundation applications, mattresses, tubes, marine and non-marine cells, containers made of the same filled with incoherent materials, for construction applications in general, namely, geotechnical, landfill, erosion control marine, asphalt, roads, concrete, fencing and foundation applications, blocks of concrete, panels of concrete, retaining walls not of steel, earth retention systems, namely, reinforced slopes, and slope facings not of steel | ACTIVE | — |
| 022 | fabrics knit, extruded, either stretched or not used alone or in combination with other materials or productions for construction, geotechnics, mining, soil reinforcement and soil stabilization and plastic meshes and fabrics woven, knit,coated,extruded, either stretched or not used alone or in combination with other materials or products for us in packaging, sport, fencing, agriculture, aquaculture, horticulture, gardening ,do it yourself, breeding, landfill, furniture, carpeting, automotive, seating, clothing, and erosion control | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | construction of civil engineering structures, namely, retaining walls, steepened slopes, earth retention systems, soil reinforcement and soil stabilization systems, foundations, road and asphalt systems, landfills and other waste containment facilities, coastal and waterway construction and protection systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | design of civil engineering structures for others, namely, retaining walls, steepened slopes, earth retention systems, soil reinforcement and soil stabilization systems, foundations, road and asphalt systems, landfills and other waste containment facilities, coastal and waterway construction and protection systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tensar Corporation, The
- Other trademarks owned by Tensar Corporation, The
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MEREX
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 15, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 5, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |