USPTO serial 75302661
ESPRIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2598201Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 23, 2002
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ESPRIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Road Town, VG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa Gates
Lisa Gates Baker & McKenzie LLP300 East Randolph StreetSuite 5000Chicago, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfume; hand and body lotions; bath gels | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Esprit de Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Esprit de Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Esprit de Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Esprit IP Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named ESPRIT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 5, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 5, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 26, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 24, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 22, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 7, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 1998 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |