USPTO serial 75302759
PRIMO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRIMO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE D DICKOS
GEORGE D DICKOS KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLP1500 OLIVER BLDGPITTSBURGH, PA 15222UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | suntan lotion, suntan oil, suntan cream, sunblock lotion, sunblock cream, self tanning sunblock lotions, namely, non-medicated skin lotions which impart tanned appearance to the skin without the necessity of exposure of the skin to sunlight or ultra-violet light and accelerate or enhance or accelerate and enhance a tan acquired from exposure to sunlight or ultra-violet light, and shield the skin from the harmful effects of sunlight or ultra-violet light and also to function as skin moisturizers | ABANDONED | Apr 15, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 1, 1998 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 13, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |