USPTO serial 75303296
NC SERVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NC SERVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D PETER HARVEY
D PETER HARVEY CARR MUSSMAN & HARVEY3 EMBARCADERO CTR STE 1060SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4056UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs for business, scientific, technical, commercial, educational and personal computing uses, and for entertainment, namely, video on demand, computer games on demand, music on demand, and text and graphics on demand, in the fields of databases, database management, operating systems, word processing, scheduling, electronic mail, spreadsheets, network browsing and presentations, to be used with single computers, and to be used with local computer networks and a global computer information network for the transfer and dissemination of information in the form of text, graphics, video, voice and music, and instructional manuals distributed therewith | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |