Drawing for THIS IS NO SPAM!

USPTO serial 75303566

THIS IS NO SPAM!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2213532Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 22, 1998
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THIS IS NO SPAM!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ALAN N. SUTIN

ALAN N SUTIN GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLPMETLIFE BLDG200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035direct mail advertising servicesSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2000C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Apr 20, 2000C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Dec 22, 1998R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Oct 26, 1998CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Sep 8, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 18, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance