USPTO serial 75304961
I INTELLITEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, WANDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with I INTELLITEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JANET E MARTINEZ
JANET E MARTINEZ COBB COLE & BELL150 MAGNOLIA AVEDAYTONA BEACH, FL 32114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronics for use in recreational vehicles, motor homes, conversion vans, and over-the-road trucks, namely, electronic dash display which displays the speed, fuel availability, temperature, oil pressure, battery level, and mileage; fuse blocks; electronic battery saving device which monitors the voltage of a battery used in the above described vehicles and which disconnects the battery at such time as voltage falls below a certain level; electronic energy management system which monitors the amount of energy required by each system in the above described vehicles and routes energy to the system that must be operated at any one time; chemical defense equipment in the nature of remote sensing chemical agent alarms utilizing passive, infrared spectrometer with on board microcomputer making agent/no-agent decisions; common module, two field-of-view, forward looking infrared systems utilized for standoff detection of nerve agents; hand held monitors of post attack chemical agent contamination; and electronic alarms utilized in gas filtration, coarse dust, and chemical agent filtration system | ACTIVE | Apr 30, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |