Drawing for ANGUS ADVANTAGE

USPTO serial 75305685

ANGUS ADVANTAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WILSON, ANGELA BISHOP
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ANGUS ADVANTAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bradlee R. Frazer

Bradlee R. Frazer Hawley Troxell877 W. Main StreetSuite 1000Boise, ID 83702

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035procurement, namely, purchasing meat for othersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 24, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 14, 2000EX2MSOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER MAILED
Apr 14, 2000EX2DSOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED
Jan 18, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 22, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 18, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 19, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 27, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 25, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 21, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 22, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 25, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance