Drawing for TECHLINE

USPTO serial 75307075

TECHLINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCGEE, KAREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TECHLINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KEVIN C TROCK

KEVIN C TROCK LAFF WHITESEL CONTE & SARET LTD401 N MICHIGAN AVE STE 1700CHICAGO, IL 60611UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006custom-made theatrical equipment, namely, metal trusses, metal beams, metal grids, metal scaffolding and metal roofing; metal staging, namely, portable stages and risers for elevating performs and equipment during theatrical performances; metal set pieces, namely, lift towers for raising theatrical equipmentACTIVE—
011cases specially adapted for carrying and storing theatrical lighting equipment; non-motorized carts specially-adapted for holding and storing theatrical lighting equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 19, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 27, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 26, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 10, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 30, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 9, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 4, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance