USPTO serial 75307391
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Port Washington, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adam Siegartel
Adam Siegartel Haynes and Boone, LLP2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700Dallas, TX 75219UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | artificial fingernails, nail glue remover, nail treatment preparations, namely, nail strengtheners, nail sealer for use over fingernail polish or bare nails, and nail hardener for protecting fingernails; nail polish kits comprised of adhesive strengthener for applying artificial nails and nail tips and for repairing broken nails, nail polish, and fingernail art and design products for use only on fingernails, namely, foils, glitters, stripping tape, water decals, stickers, charms, dangles, air brush stencils and paints; and acrylic fingernail sculpturing kits comprised of liquid acrylic nails, acrylic nail powder, primer, nail glue, and acrylic nail forms; blush; eye makeup; eye pencils; eye shadow; eyebrow pencils; mascara; foundation makeup; lipstick and perfume | ABANDONED | Aug 1, 1997 |
| 008 | manicure implements, namely, emery boards, nail files, nail clippers, nail punchers, cuticle scissors and tweezers | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | nail treatment accessories, namely, brushes for applying nail polish and nail glue | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 27, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 9, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |