USPTO serial 75307728
DOCTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 5, 2000
- Examiner
- RILEY, CAITLIN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with DOCTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEUSTADT AN DER ORLA, DE
07318 Saalfeld, DE
07318 Saalfeld, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa B. Lane
Lisa B. Lane Fox Rothschild LLP997 Lenox DriveLawrenceville, NJ 08648-2311UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ MACHINES FOR MOLDING LENSES ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | [ MOVIE PROJECTORS, PHOTOGRAPHIC PROJECTORS, SLIDE PROJECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF; OPTICAL FILTERS, ] OPTICAL PRISMS, OPTICAL MIRRORS; OPTICAL SYSTEMS CONSISTING OF AT LEAST ONE LENS, [ A REFLECTOR, A FILTER, ] A PRISM OR A MIRROR FOR USE IN [ PRINTERS, ] SCANNERS [, COPIERS ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | [ VEHICLE HEADLIGHTS, FLOODLIGHTS, LAMP REFLECTORS, ] LENSES AND MOLDED LENSES FOR USE IN VEHICLE HEADLIGHTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DOCTER OPTICS SE
- Other trademarks owned by Docter Optics GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Docter Optics GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named DOCTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 6, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 15, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 1, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 31, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2006 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 19, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |