USPTO serial 75308383
NEUROLOGICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEUROLOGICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
101 Reykjavik, IS
101 Reykjavik, IS
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK E MILLER
MARK E MILLER FLIESLER DUBB MEYER & LOVEJOY LLP4 EMBARCADERO CTR STE 400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4156UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs for recording, displaying, and analyzing electroencephalograms, or EEGs, and other biological electrical signals; and computer programs and up-dates to computer programs that may be downloaded from a global network for recording, displaying and analyzing electroencephalograms, or EEGs, and other biological electrical signals | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, providing technical support for programs that record, display, and analyze biological electrical signals, and up-dating of computer software by means of a computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 7, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 21, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 6, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |