USPTO serial 75308598
TRANSTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ODONOVICH, ANITA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRANSTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY A DIVNEY
JEFFREY A DIVNEY HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP1700 LINCOLN ST STE 4100DENVER, CO 80203-4541UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | upper stage launch vehicles, namely, earth to orbit, orbital and orbit to earth upper stage launchers | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | upper stage integration and launch services, namely, uniting upper stage launch vehicles to launch vehicles and payloads, launching upper stage launch vehicles and mission life services in the nature of controlling upper stage launch vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lockheed Martin Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Lockheed Martin Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named TRANSTAR
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 11, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 18, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 23, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |