USPTO serial 75308629
PROMAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COOK, BRADLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROMAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
4153 Reinach BL1, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES A COLES
JAMES A COLES BOSE MCKINNEY & EVANS2700 1ST INDIANA PLZ135 N PENNSYLVANIAINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electromagnetic flowmeters | ACTIVE | May 21, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 28, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 30, 1999 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 7, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |