USPTO serial 75309438
TPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Walkersville, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAELA BARRY
800 NETHERCLIFFE HALL RDGREAT FALLS, VA 22066UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | computer services, namely, adult oriented bulletin board communication services for entertainment purposes, via computers linked by modem, and/or globally linked by a shared protocol | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| May 10, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 18, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |