USPTO serial 75310370
CONTOUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONTOUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Buena Vista, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SIMOR L MOSKOWITZ
SIMOR L MOSKOWITZ JACOBSON PRICE HOLMAN & STERN PLLCTHE JENIFER BLDG400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | cushion shoe insole material sold in sheet or roll form | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2000 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 5, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |