Drawing for THE OFFICIAL BEER OF THE 21ST CENTURY

USPTO serial 75310564

THE OFFICIAL BEER OF THE 21ST CENTURY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, TERESA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE OFFICIAL BEER OF THE 21ST CENTURY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SCOTT D MILLER

SCOTT D MILLER ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES INC1 BUSCH PLST LOUIS, MO 63118-1852UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021drinking vesselsACTIVEFeb 10, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 2000ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 24, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 2, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2000CNSRALLOWED SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jul 26, 2000CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 28, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 20, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 1999SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 19, 1999EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 1, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 19, 1999EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 4, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 4, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 12, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 17, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 17, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 16, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 6, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance