USPTO serial 75310768
DOMINO INTRANET STARTER PACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DOMINO INTRANET STARTER PACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK B HARRISON
MARK B HARRISON SPENCER & FRANK1100 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 300 EWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3955UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software, including downloadable software, for designing websites and for accessing global computer and local information networks, and user manuals sold as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | distributorship services in the field of computer programs offered from a web site on a global computer information network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lotus Development Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Lotus Development Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named DOMINO INTRANET STARTER PACK
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 15, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 18, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |