USPTO serial 75310812
OWNER'S EDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PATER, MATT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OWNER'S EDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD L. BARTELS
DONALD L BARTELS COUDERT BROTHERS LLP600 BEACH STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109-1312UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | publications, namely, books, and newspaper and magazine articles in the field of management consulting and business management | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | business management and consulting services in the field of growing businesses | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, providing on-line books, newspapers, and magazines in the field of management consulting and business management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Weld, John T.
- Other trademarks owned by Weld, John T.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named OWNER'S EDGE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 22, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 28, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |