USPTO serial 75311023
PROCREA BIOSCIENCES INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROCREA BIOSCIENCES INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montreal, Province of Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE G GRIGEL
WELLS ST JOHN ROBERTS GREGORY & MATKIN601 W 1ST AVE STE 1300SPOKANE, WA 99201-3828Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | medical, clinal, and laboratory kits consisting of diagnostic preparations and sampling instruments for testing endometriosis and masculine infertility, paternity tests, genetic tests, and therapeutic treatments, namely, pharmaceutical preparations for treating endometriosis and infertility | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | CLINICAL AND LABORATORY SERVICES FOR HUMAN REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |